Muslim in Suffer

Bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem. Assalamu\’alaikum Warohmatullahi Wabarokatuh!

9/11 : We are avoiding physics of WTC

Posted by musliminsuffer on April 23, 2009

In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful

=== News Update ===


9/11 : We are avoiding physics of WTC


Recently, explosive scientific evidence proving that high-tech nano-thermitic material was present in the World Trade Center dust was reported in a scientific journal titled, “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe.”

Authored by an international team of physicists and chemists, the article in the Open Chemical Physics Journal 2009, Vol. 2, said, “We conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.”

In short, the paper destroys the official story that “no evidence” exists for explosive or pyrotechnic materials in the WTC towers, and is devastating to the mainstream “explanation” that three WTC buildings were somehow demolished by the two hijacked airplanes. Further, it reinforces the position of over 600 registered architects and engineers who have shown the impossibilities of a gravity-driven “collapse” as put fourth with the “official” version.

Because of the difficulty in refuting the solid evidence of explosives inside those three towers, defenders of the “official story” have resorted to ridicule the character of the article’s publisher, and those engineers that trust physics over politics.

Why hasn’t this been reported in the mainstream media? Perhaps because most are afraid to really look into the physics of 9/11, since fear of the known is sometimes worse then fear of the unknown.

Jonathan H. Cole




-muslim voice-

One Response to “9/11 : We are avoiding physics of WTC”

  1. Skyscrapers must hold themselves up. People claiming to know physics have spent NINE YEARS making fools of themselves by not demanding to know the distribution of steel in the towers. The NIST report does not even specify the total amount of concrete.

    The entire idea of the top 15% of a 1360 foot building coming straight down and destroying the rest at 50% of gravitational acceleration is ridiculous. Aren’t there skyscrapers in Japan? But the Japanese government sent men to Iraq. How DUMB was that?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: