Muslim in Suffer

Bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem. Assalamu\’alaikum Warohmatullahi Wabarokatuh!

Archive for October, 2007

Report: “360 Palestinian children are imprisoned by Israel, facing harsh conditions”

Posted by musliminsuffer on October 31, 2007

bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem
In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful

=== News Update ===

Report: “360 Palestinian children are imprisoned by Israel, facing harsh conditions”

IMEMC

Tuesday October 30, 2007

The Wa’ed Society for political prisoners and ex-prisoner, reported on Monday that the Israeli army continued its violations against the Palestinian people, continued the arrest campaign, and that currently there are 360 Palestinian children still imprisoned in several Israeli prisons and detention facilities.

The Society slammed the illegal Israeli military practices against the Palestinian people and added that Palestinian children are repeatedly targeted by the army in the occupied territories.

The Society also stated that the army kidnapped nearly 7000 Palestinians since the beginning of the Al Aqsa Intifada in September 28, 2000.

The number of Palestinian children currently imprisoned by Israel is 360, the society said, and added that the imprisoned children are facing harsh conditions, mistreatment and repeated attacks.

Half of the detained children were sentenced by military courts while the other half is still detained, awaiting trial or under interrogation.

The Society stated that the Israeli prison authorities are barring child detainees from their visitations rights, in addition to not providing them with decent meals and are placing them with adult Israeli prisoners who are detained for criminal conducts.

The children are also not allowed to meet with their lawyers on regular basis, repeatedly confined to solitary and subjecting to insults by the soldiers.

The Society voiced an appealed to human rights groups to expose the illegal Israeli practices against the detainees, especially the children, and demanded legal organizations, local and international human right institutions to act against these practices and to ensure that the detainees receive their rights in accordance to the international law and the basic principle of human rights.

source:
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m37680&hd=&size=1&l=e

===

-muslim voice-
______________________________________
BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

International (UN) rejection of Israeli penal measures against Gaza

Posted by musliminsuffer on October 31, 2007

bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem
In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful

=== News Update ===

International (UN) rejection of Israeli penal measures against Gaza

Palestinian Information Center

October 30, 2007

GAZA, (PIC)– The UN Secretary General, Ban Ki-Moon, on Tuesday criticized the Israeli new penal measures on the Gaza Strip, describing them as “unacceptable” and doubled the human suffering of the Gaza inhabitants.

The UN senior executive urged the Israeli government to re-consider the siege imposed on the Gaza Strip and urged all parties concerned to protect Palestinian civilians.

For her part, the EU commissioner for external relations, Benita Ferrero-Waldner, condemned the measures that affect the basic necessities of the Palestinians and warned of mass punishment against the Strip.

She underlined that the new penalties would lead to “serious consequences” on the local population.

A Russian foreign ministry statement said that the isolation and punishments would affect the inhabitants’ basic needs.

The organization of Islamic conference denounced the Israeli mass punishments and warned of its serious ramifications on the human and health fields.

The Israeli prosecutor general Mini Mazuz had refused his government’s decision to cut power supply to the Strip but approved other economic sanctions.

Official Palestinian sources asserted that Israeli fuel to the Gaza electricity station were slashed starting on Sunday along with diesel and benzene by a percentage reaching quarter to half the usual quantity.

source:
http://uruknet.info/?p=m37703&hd=&size=1&l=e

===

-muslim voice-
______________________________________
BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

UN : US accused of torture

Posted by musliminsuffer on October 31, 2007

bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem
In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful

=== News Update ===

UN : US accused of torture

Ian Munro Herald Correspondent in New York

Under fire ... the US government has been criticised by the UN.

Under fire … the US government has been criticised by the UN.

Photo: AFP

October 31, 2007

THE United States’s willingness to resort to harsh interrogation techniques in its so-called war on terror undermined human rights and the international ban on torture, a United Nations spokesman says.

Manfred Nowak, UN Special Rapporteur on torture, said the US’s standing and importance meant it was a model to other countries which queried why they were subject to scrutiny when the US resorted to measures witnessed at Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib prison.

Mr Nowak was speaking after releasing his finding that the use of torture was routine and widespread in Sri Lanka ,despite laws against it.

“I am very concerned about the undermining of the absolute prohibition of torture by interrogation methods themselves in Abu Grahib, in Guantanamo Bay and others, but also by rendition and the whole CIA secret places of detention. All that is really undermining the international rule of law in general and human rights but also the prohibition of torture,” said Mr Nowak.

“(Other countries) say why are you criticising us if the US, the most democratic country with the oldest history of human rights, if they are torturing you should first go there. It has a negative effect because the US is a very powerful and important country and many other countries take the US as a model.”

His comments come amid continuing controversy over whether the use of waterboarding – which simulates drowning – is torture. US senators are threatening to stop the appointment of Michael Mukasey, President Bush’s new nominee for Attorney-General, following Mr Mukasey’s refusal to condemn waterboarding at judiciary committee hearings recently.

Reports have linked CIA interrogations of al-Qaeda suspects, including alleged 9/11 planner Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, to the technique.

President Bush has said the US does not restort to torture, but his administation has refused to say if waterboarding has been used. During waterboarding a cloth is used to cover a prisoner’s mouth and water poured over it, triggering the gag reflex.

Commenting on his investigation into Sri Lanka, Mr Nowak said that the use of torture in counter-terrorism operations was prone to become routine.

During his visit there this month he received many “consistent and credible” allegations from detainees who claimed they were ill-treated by police.

He said that he was alerted to a new form of torture which his medical aide had initially thought was impossible. It involved individuals being suspended only by their thumbs which were bound together so they could be hoisted into the air.

source:
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/us-accused-of-torture/2007/10/30/1193618879492.html

===

-muslim voice-
______________________________________
BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

The biggest threat to the West lies within itself, not with Islam

Posted by musliminsuffer on October 31, 2007

bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem
In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful

=== News Update ===

The biggest threat to the West lies within itself, not with Islam

Simon Jenkins

mailto:simon.jenkins@sunday-times.co.uk

October 14, 2007

I remember as a small boy going from door to door in our village collecting money for a missionary ship, the John Williams. It was taking God to the heathen of the East Indies, a distant realm to which the Good Lord, despite His all-seeing wisdom, had carelessly (and I thought excitingly) denied His presence. It never occurred to me that the natives might adhere to some other faith. I saw them waiting eagerly on the beach for the Bible to be carried ashore, wondering only why the Royal Mail was so slow.

Last week a 29-page letter to the Pope was issued from a galaxy of 138 Muslim leaders designed to refute any such exclusive creed. It pleaded for better understanding between Christians and Muslims, based on a shared monotheism and the affinity between the Bible and the Koran. Both contained commandments to love a single god and to love one’s neighbour. The archaic language boiled down to hoping that the two religions might respect each other because “the future of the world depends on peace between Muslims and Christians”.

The letter is certainly an advance on the first missive to Nicephorus, a 9th-century prince of Rome, from Harun al-Rashid, a Muslim caliph.

Addressing “thou Roman dog”, Rashid wrote, “I have read thy letter, O thou son of an unbelieving mother. Thou shalt not hear, thou shalt behold, my reply.” He proceeded to massacre half Byzantium.

Rashid’s successors are more circumspect. They implicitly rebut George Bush’s “He who is not with us is against us” speech after 9/11. “Islam is not against the Christians,” the letter declares, “so long as they do not wage war against Muslims on account of their religion, oppress them and drive them out of their homes.” Nor is this debate “simply a matter for polite ecumenical dialogue between leaders”. The “eternal souls” of those who “relish conflict and destruction” are at stake, not to mention “the survival of the world”.

Coming at the end of Ramadan, the letter is impressive. The signatories embrace a global range of grand muftis, imams, sheikhs and scholars from all denominations of Islam, with a wide span of theological influence. The appeal to religious tolerance at a time of tension between Islam and the West is welcome. But what the letter means needs deconstruction.

Religious leaders like to claim headlines by subjecting politics to a downpour of platitude. The letter makes no mention of (monotheistic) Jews, let alone Hindus and Buddhists. It merely invites the Pope, the Archbishop of Canterbury and others to acknowledge what the archbishop calls “their common scriptural foundations . . . as a basis for justice and peace in the world”. Two religions that embrace “half of humanity” should stand together or, by implication, there will be war.

Such an implication is grandiose, dangerous and wrong. It implies that the Muslim world has a politico-military power that is in some sense equal and opposite to that of Christianity. This elevates the so-called jihadist tendency within Islam to a status that it does not have and should never think it has. It suggests Islam has sufficient power to confront and possibly undermine the West. It implies a balance of power parallel with a balance of theological interpretation.

Such an implication feeds a no less dangerous paranoia in the West. By stating that the “survival of the world” might turn on a struggle between Islam and Christianity, the letter reinforces the militarist fantasies of neoconservatives who see the world as just such a struggle. It is a paranoia which, since 9/11, has driven the “war on terror” and fomented the tension and antagonism to the West to which the scholars’ letter is so vacuous a response.

The chief threat to world security at present lies in the capacity of tiny groups of political Islamists to goad the West into a rolling military retaliation. Extremists on each side feed off the others’ frenzied scenarios so as to garner money and political support for their respective armies of the night. Each sees the other as a cosmic menace and abandons communal tolerance and peaceful diplomacy to counter it. The authors of this letter would be better employed vetting their own blood-curdling mullahs and madrasahs than in writing platitudes to the Pope.

I am proud to be a cheerleader for western values. I see the West – proxy for the letter’s “Christians” – as powerful without precedent. The American-European economic and political axis is unconquerable. For all its occasional and manifold lapses, capitalist democracy has been tested and not found wanting. Other societies such as Russia, China and India all measure themselves against the West’s success and seek in varying degrees to emulate it. To this extent Francis Fukuyama was right to call the end of the cold war “the end of history”.

The Muslim world is more detached. Its religious habits scare nervous westerners into seeing it as a shrouded, black-clad menace. It is a less ordered society and more capable of perpetrating, or at least excusing, outrages against western targets. But these outrages are of frustration rather than conquest. While they can kill people and destroy property, they do not “threaten the West”, let alone undermine western values. If any Muslim state were rash enough to declare a war of aggression against Europe or America, of which there is no sign, it would be beaten.

There is no Saladin or Tamerlane riding out of the desert to subject the West to a new caliphate. There is rather a job for the police, local and international, one at which they seem reasonably competent. America and Britain, for example, have each seen just one successful attack by Muslim terrorists in the past decade. While other attacks have been forestalled, we would be mad to see them as constituting a war of civilisations and religions.

There may be young Muslims and their teachers with a vested interest in talking up such a war. There are those in the West with the same interest, such as the booming armaments and security industries with their think tanks and lobbyists.

Such vested interests need to be exposed as such. To portray Islam as a whole as a concerted threat to western security, and to imply that the West’s democratic institutions and freedoms are not proof against that threat, is absurd and close to treason. Then to demand that western freedoms be dismantled and stored away for the duration of a “war on terror” is to wave the flag of surrender.

This defeatism led the American Congress to allow its president to authorise torture and detention without trial in what Senator Robert Byrd called “the slow unravelling of the people’s liberties”. It enabled a British Home Office to curb free speech and habeas corpus. It arms police, fortifies buildings and impedes the free movement of citizens. It makes every Christian suspicious of every Muslim.

This poison has not been generated by the teaching of Sayyid Qutb and his Al-Qaeda fanatics, but in the overreaction to them. After sowing their mayhem they, and not Afghanistan and Iraq, should have been targeted and eliminated. The belligerence and ineptitude of western policy over the past decade has turned nobodies into heroes of the Muslim world. The most incompetent period of western diplomacy since the 1930s has left the West hated and cities everywhere at the mercy of any Muslim misfit with a sack of explosive.

When Thomas Paine told America that “we have it in our power to begin the world over again”, he meant by example, not military conquest. His utopianism was a brave, confident and open-hearted one. That of his successors is sinking into the opposite, a fearful, besieged, security-obsessed wimpishness, in which Muslims rightly feel threatened by the arbitrary violence of the American right.

It is ironic that defeat in the cold war should have led Russia to the exuberant self-confidence of Vladimir Putin’s Moscow, while victory has plunged the West into a loss of nerve. In both Washington and London are leaders who have so little confidence in democracy as to regard it as vulnerable to a few madmen, and who have so little respect for democracy’s freedoms as to suspend them at the bang of a bomb.

I believe in the robustness of the democracies created in the West over the past half-century. I am not sure that our leaders do.

source:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/simon_jenkins/article2652762.ece

===

-muslim voice-
______________________________________
BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

All Canadians (West) benefit from Islamic history month

Posted by musliminsuffer on October 31, 2007

bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem
In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful

=== News Update ===

All Canadians (West) benefit from Islamic history month

JUDITH MILLER – Oct 30, 2007 (The Record)

Late last month Canadian senators Mobina Jaffer and Hugh Segal launched the first Islamic History Month Canada for October.

Good for them. They supported an opportunity to build bridges of experience and understanding.

Canadian Muslims, with the support of a wide range of people from many backgrounds, originated Islamic History Month Canada so that all Canadians may share in this annual recognition of the nation’s largest non-Christian faith group.

Muslims and non-Muslims in Canada are benefiting from attention focused on the rich legacy of Islam, which belongs to all Canadians. This heritage comes to us from many countries and cultures.

Much of it might be called a lost history. This month gives all of us a chance to notice the Muslim culture, which is developing around us, as well as to acknowledge its wider contribution to human history.

North America’s oldest mosque is still standing, preserved as a national heritage site in Edmonton. And in Toronto there is a mosque with a multi-function gymnasium — a facility that is used for events such as basketball games and sports tournaments, school graduations, fashion shows and lectures. On Fridays, however, it becomes a place of prayer. University classrooms which have just been used for lectures on sociology, mathematics or computer science are converted on Fridays into prayer halls.

In the Western world, Canada has the highest per capita number of Muslim senators and members of Parliament.

In urban Canada, mosques and churches share parking lots. The largest Protestant church in the country has publicly declared that Muslims worship the same God that Christians do.

During Islamic History Month, we are noticing the wonderful riches offered to all of us when artists blend Islamic traditions with Western approaches to the visual arts, theatre, food, fashion, architecture, literature and music.

While Muslims are a small minority here — fewer than three per cent of the total Canadian population — the community comprises a wide variety of immigrants from some 40 different national, linguistic and ethnic backgrounds. And over 50 per cent of Canada’s 750,000 Muslims, based on 2007 population figures, are Canadian-born.

On the Indian subcontinent, Muslims form a minority of some 400 million — an astonishingly high number for a minority. They created one of the world’s great cultures, highlighted by such imposing monuments as the Taj Mahal. And Muslim culture has enriched many other areas, such as Spain and Eastern Europe, Indonesia and countries of Africa.

Now it is Canada’s turn to celebrate the Islamic legacy. Medicine, architecture, art, law, mathematics all bear the marks of contributions from the Islamic world.

A rediscovery and renewed appreciation of Islamic history and the present day accomplishments of Muslims give us a wider understanding that will help us see — and address — present conflicts within the larger view of human history.

Senators Jaffer and Segal deserve our thanks, as well as to all the other Canadian citizens who are asking us to turn our attention to the art, culture and history of Islam, and to the things which unite us rather than those which divide us.

Especially pleasing was our Canadian Parliament’s statement of support for Islamic History Month in Canada. On Oct. 25, Parliament officially declared an Islamic History Month in Canada.

Mauril Bélanger, the Liberal MP from Ottawa-Vanier and opposition critic for Canadian Heritage, Francophonie and Official Languages presented this motion in the House of Commons: “That, in the opinion of the House, due to the important contributions of Canadian Muslims to Canadian society; the cultural diversity of the Canadian Muslim community; the importance of Canadians learning about each other to foster greater social cohesion; and the important effort now underway in many Canadian communities in organizing public activities to achieve better understanding of Islamic history, the month of October should be designated Canadian Islamic History Month.”

“I believe that by having a better understanding of our fellow Canadians from various communities and backgrounds that we will achieve a stronger and more cohesive country,” said Bélanger.

Several cities across Canada have declared October Islamic History Month, and locally special events have been organized with support from the City of Kitchener, the Kitchener Public Library, the University of Waterloo, Renison College, and the UW School of Architecture, as well as some private citizens.

Judith Miller is a member of Islamic History Month Canada advisory board and is a professor of English at Renison College, University of Waterloo.

source:
http://www.therecord.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=record/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1193728543553&call_pageid=1024322168441&col=1024322596091

===

-muslim voice-
______________________________________
BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

It’s us (west) who created the xenophobia

Posted by musliminsuffer on October 31, 2007

bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem
In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful

=== News Update ===

It’s us (west) who created the xenophobia

Naomi Lakritz – Calgary Herald

Thursday, October 25, 2007

If an us versus them mentality is growing in Canada towards minorities, it’s us who created it, not them. The xenophobia marinating in that slimy little euphemism of “reasonable accommodation” which originated in Quebec, is a symptom of what’s wrong with our mindset, not theirs.

Fifteen or 20 years ago, the idea arose that minorities were offended by Christmas and other overt displays of majority Canadian culture. This did not come from minority Canadians, but from self-proclaimed progressive middle-class whites. These people thought it was the height of liberalism to declare their own cultural and religious traditions offensive to others and to fight to have those traditions hidden away, much as the Victorians covered the legs on their pianos in the cause of prudery. Schools rushed to rip down Remembrance Day displays of white crosses.

Christmas was relabelled a “winter festival,” venomous battles were fought over public displays of creches featuring — ironically — the infant who grew up to be the ultimate preacher of brotherly love, and spruce trees festooned with glass balls, tinsel and angels were renamed holiday season trees.

In all that time, no member of a minority was quoted as claiming to be offended by any majority Canadian ritual. In fact, people who said they were Sikhs, Hindus and Muslims wrote letters to the editor stating that not only were they bewildered that all this was being done on their behalf, but that they didn’t mind being wished a Merry Christmas and always returned the greeting. (A few years back, when I received a Christmas card from Calgary MP Deepak Obhrai, I could joke with colleagues that when a Hindu MP sends a Jewish person Christmas greetings, we have reached the acme of multiculturalism).

The same crusaders who misread Pierre Trudeau’s vision of multiculturalism, and who thought it meant that minority traditions had to be elevated at the expense of their own squelched one, enthusiastically organized festivals for other cultures and prattled ceaselessly about “tolerance.” Until one day, in this post-9/11 era, the sight of a peasant skirt whirling in a folk dance at a festival began to take on sinister connotations. Just how much were we going to put up with from these people?

So we began zeroing in on the very traditions we had once avidly promoted. A woman wearing a head scarf was suddenly no longer a proud Muslim enjoying the freedom of religion this country offered her, but an oppressed soul to be liberated. She must be stripped of this symbol of oppression by others who, treating her in the same white-man-knows-what’s-best-for-you manner, once scorned as the domain of right-wing bigots, took it upon themselves to decide what was best for her.

What has surfaced here in Canada since 9/11, and what has led to the ominous talk about “reasonable accommodation,” is a variation on the same xenophobic theme that saw Japanese- and Ukrainian-Canadians carted off to internment camps during the two world wars.

It’s fear, pure and simple. Fear of The Other is spawned when someone of a certain religion, skin colour or culture commits some heinous and hostile act.

Then, heretofore “tolerant” folks in Canada begin looking askance at their fellow citizens of that religion, colour or culture. Ignorance — the kind of ignorance that sees a Muslim who fled persecution and mass murder in Srebrenica as no different from a Muslim with links to al-Qaeda — feeds that fear of The Other.

To avoid making it look like they’re singling out Muslims as a direct result of 9/11, the “reasonable” accommodators have clumsily targeted all minorities.

Well, not all, and that’s what makes their stance so transparently racist. If they perceive the tendency of ethnic groups to cluster together in neighbourhoods as a threat, why have they never shown any concern about suburbs such as Montreal North and neighbouring St. Leonard? Peopled by Italian immigrants — many of whom in the older generation speak neither French nor English, but only the regional dialect of their town in Italy — these communities have been home to notorious Mafiosi like Paolo Violi, the “godfather of St. Leonard.”

Italians are a minority, but no one claims their women are oppressed by bocce and black dresses. Why? Because this is all about Muslims, not about Europeans.

These Muslims are the same people they were when we stashed the creche in the closet and talked up Ramadan while playing down Remembrance Day. They are citizens, neighbours, co-workers — everyday folks going about their lives same as any other Canadians. We conjured up the new catchphrase “reasonable accommodation” out of mindless fear. They didn’t change for the worse. We did.

nlakritz@theherald.canwest.com

source:
http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/columnists/story.html?id=e775e246-105f-45ec-8061-bef025ac7d37

===

-muslim voice-
______________________________________
BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Q and A on Holloween in Toronto Star

Posted by musliminsuffer on October 31, 2007

bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem
In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful

=== News Update ===

Q and A on Holloween in Toronto Star

Q: I run a small child care business in my home: I have three kids (3-year-olds), plus my own each day. One of the kids comes from a Muslim home. When the family contacted me in September, they asked me to promise I would not “indoctrinate” their child by celebrating religious holidays; our family is agnostic so that was easy. Last week, I sent home a note suggesting the kids come in Halloween costumes next Wednesday so we could have a little party. All the kids were excited, but the Muslim parents accused me of “breaking my promise” and demanded I cancel the party. I consider this ridiculous ­ Halloween has nothing to do with Christianity! I tried to explain, but they were adamant.

Must I deprive the rest of the kids (and myself ­ I love Halloween) just to satisfy misinformed parents?

A: Halloween becomes more like Christmas every year. Both have origins in pagan festivals. Both are fun for kids, involving late-night illuminations, the giving of gifts, and over-consumption of unhealthy foods. Neither has much to do with Christianity.

But Halloween’s roots are planted firmly in the soil of ancient religious practice ­ both Celtic and Roman. It’s certainly become part of Western culture.

And it plays a major role in the dominant religion of our day: Consumerism. For all these reasons, some Muslims consider Halloween as “dangerous” a holiday as Christmas. The latter, at least, has a flickering connection with the birth of a man considered a prophet by Islam.

So yes, you are stuck with your promise. Cancel the party.

Send your questions to Ken Gallinger at ethical@sympatico.ca

Source: http://www.thestar.com/News/Ideas/article/270942

source :
www.montrealmuslimnews.net

===

-muslim voice-
______________________________________
BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Ziegler – UN : Israel is the worst colonial regime

Posted by musliminsuffer on October 30, 2007

bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem
In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful

=== News Update ===

Ziegler – UN : Israel is the worst colonial regime

[ 28/10/2007 – 04:48 PM ]

NEW YORK, (PIC)– Jean Ziegler, the UN special rapporteur on right to food, castigated the Israeli occupation and described it as the only “colonial regime” which refuses to abide by any international law, calling on the UN to adopt an effective policy forcing Israel to respect human rights and the Geneva Convention.

“The Israeli occupation is a colonial regime and an illegal military occupation from the UN’s point of view, it continues to annex more Palestinian lands; and thus the Israeli occupation is the worst in the history of colonialism,” Ziegler stated in a TV interview.

The UN official underlined that the Israeli occupation is causing starvation, physical and psychological oppression to the Palestinian people, but he noted that there is Palestinian resistance, questioning the reason behind the EU’s complicity with the Israeli occupation and why US funds are protecting this occupation.

The rapporteur described the EU countries as completely “hypocritical” because they refused the results of democratic elections supervised by them after they saw that the winner is Hamas, pointing out that the Europeans should have the bare minimum of principles.

Ziegler pointed out that the human situation in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank is deteriorated, because the UN statistics revealed that 65 percent of the population of the West Bank are suffering from malnutrition; besides, the Gaza Strip, which is inhabited by more than 1.5 million people has turned into a big prison as a result of the Israeli siege imposed on it.

He also described the Quartet on the Middle East as a mere shop front, calling on the UN and the EU to withdraw from it as long as their presence in this Quartet is meaningless and useless.

As a validation for what the UN special rapporteur had stated about the suppressive policies of the Israeli occupation, the IOA started on Sunday to reduce the allocations of fuel supplies to the Gaza Strip under the Israeli government’s resolution which considers the Gaza Strip as a “hostile entity”.

The spokesman for Israeli war minister Ehud Barak told AFP that the reduction in the fuel supplies to Gaza will begin as of Sunday and that there will be frequent power outages in the next few days.

source:
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/en/default.aspx?xyz=U6Qq7k%2bcOd87MDI46m9rUxJEpMO%2bi1s7leKnnQwmY9duRHZ09yVBqV%2fphl5aopldmusl%2bua7P5TW300dIVvWcHJnTWasRg3bcbYdgKJrCu1eyPsUMRVnl%2fX56Xpaqlv37tbMzwshG3w%3d

===

-muslim voice-
______________________________________
BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

The demanding an injunction against Israeli government to prevent disruption to supply of electricity and fuel to Gaza

Posted by musliminsuffer on October 30, 2007

bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem
In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful

=== News Update ===

OPT: Human rights organizations petition supreme court demanding an injunction against Israeli government to prevent disruption to supply of electricity and fuel to Gaza

Source: The Palestine Monitor

Date: 28 Oct 2007

Adalah – The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel

The [Israeli] Government Openly Decides, Apparently for the First Time, to Impose Collective Punishment on 1.5 million Palestinians in the Gaza Strip;
Petitioners: The Decision is Illegal and will Damage the Health, Safety and Welfare of the Population of Gaza.

Ten Palestinian and Israeli human rights organizations, in cooperation with the deputy director of a water company for towns along the coast of Gaza and a farmer from Beit Hanoun, petitioned the Supreme Court of Israel on 28 October 2007.

The petitioners demanded the immediate issuance of an injunction against the Minister of Public Security and the Prime Minister to prevent them from disrupting the supply of electricity and fuel to the Gaza Strip. The petitioners argued that the [Israeli] government’s recent decision to interrupt electricity and fuel supplies to the Gaza Strip is illegal, and if implemented, would endanger innocent civilians.

The petitioners argued that, contrary to the governments’ claims that the population of Gaza will be only slightly harmed, the implementation of this decision could cause widespread humanitarian damage. It is likely to endanger the functioning of hospitals and sewage and water services, and will interrupt the operation of medical equipment as well as vital household electrical equipment, such as refrigerators, including those needed to refrigerate essential medical supplies. The damage that will be inflicted by the disrupting of electricity and fuel supplies cannot be controlled, nor can its consequences.

Deliberately obstructing the civilian infrastructure in the Gaza Strip is illegal. International law does not allow minor damage: it bans collective punishment entirely, argued the petitioners. The petitioners emphasized the dependency of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip on Israel for their electricity and fuel needs. The [Israeli] state’s claim that the population of Gaza should provide electricity for themselves is astonishing. In the decades of Israel’s direct control of Gaza, it permitted the establishment of an electricity network with an extremely limited capacity (which can provide Gaza with just 38% of the electricity that its population needs). After implementing the ‘disengagement’ from Gaza, Israel bombed the local power plant. This behaviour imposes duties on Israel towards the population of the Gaza Strip in general, and in the field of electricity supply in particular.

The human rights organizations demanded that the Supreme Court issue an immediate injunction to freeze the aforementioned governmental decision pending an examination of the petition. A number of media reports indicated Israel’s intention to implement this decision as early as today.

– Adalah, The Legal Centre for Arab Minority Rights in Israel

– Gisha – Legal Centre for Freedom of Movement

– HaMoked Centre for the Defence of the Individual

– Physicians for Human Rights (Israel)

– The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights

– The Public Committee Against Torture in Israel

– Gaza Community Mental Health Programme

– B’Tselem: The Israeli Information Centre for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories

– Al-Haq

– Al Mezan Centre for Human Rights

source:
http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/RWB.NSF/db900SID/SSHN-78FHZ6?OpenDocument

===

-muslim voice-
______________________________________
BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

ANOTHER KUWAITI DIRTY TRICK

Posted by musliminsuffer on October 30, 2007

bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem
In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful

=== News Update ===

ANOTHER KUWAITI DIRTY TRICK

October 29-31, 2007

Malcom Lagauche

topsecret.jpg

Most people blame Iraq for the August 2, 1990 military actions against Kuwait. George Bush I quickly lambasted Iraq and world public opinion considered Kuwait the aggrieved party in the conflict.

In reality, the Iraqis ran into an ambush that began long before August 2, 1990. During the Iran-Iraq War, Kuwait was already dealing with the U.S. in concocting plans to undermine the Iraqi economy. After the cease-fire, the shenanigans of Kuwait and the U.S. went into high gear.

Shortly after the Iraqis crossed the border with Kuwait, they came across documents showing collusion to harm Iraq’s economy and keep the country servile for years to come. Below is a letter sent on November 22, 1989 from Brigadier Fahd Ahmed Al Fahd to Sheikh Salem Al Sabah, the Kuwaiti Minister of the Interior. Tariq Aziz sent copies of this letter to the United Nations on October 24, 1990. It gained little fanfare because the U.S. had already smeared Iraq’s reputation and no one wanted to contradict the U.S. propaganda. The letter shows that Kuwait was working hard to injure Iraq at the time of the August 2, 1990 invasion.

On July 28, 1990, King Hussein of Jordan spoke with Sheikh Sabah, the Kuwaiti Foreign Minister. King Hussein was perplexed at Kuwait’s attitude and he told the Foreign Minister about his concern that Iraq may take military action. The Sheikh’s response was curious because Iraq had not invaded Kuwait yet and the U.S. proclaimed it had no defense agreement with Kuwait. Sheikh Sabah told King Hussein:

We cannot bargain over an inch of territory. It’s against our constitution. If Saddam comes across the border, let him come. The Americans will get him out.

Sheikh Sabah’s response was the first inclication that U.S./Kuwait relations may have been much more advanced than thought. The following letter proves this assessment.

______________________

Top Secret and Private

His Excellency Sheikh Salem Al Sabah, Minister of the Interior.

In accordance with Your Highness’s orders, as given during our meeting with you on October 22, 1989, I visited the headquarters of the United States Central Intelligence Agency, together with Colonel Ishaq Abd Al Hadi Shaddad, Director of investigations for the Governorate of Ahmadi, from November 12 to 18, 1989. The United States emphasized that the visit should be top secret in order not to arouse sensibilities among our brothers in the Gulf Cooperation Council, Iran and Iraq.

I hereby inform Your Highness of the most important elements of what was agreed with Judge William Webster, Director of the United States Central Intelligence Agency, in the course of my private meeting with him on Tuesday, November 14, 1989.

1. The United States is undertaking to train individuals selected by us to protect His Highness the Emir and His Highness Sheikh Saad Al Abdullah Al Salem Al Sabah. The instruction and training is to take place at the headquarters of the United States Intelligence Agency itself, and we have set their numbers at 128, some of whom are to be used for special missions with the royal family, as determined by His Highness the Crown Prince. In this connection the United States side informed us of its dissatisfaction with the performance of the Royal Guard forces at the time of the criminal attack on His Highness the Emir.

2. We agreed with the United States side that visits would be exchanged at all levels between the State Security Department and the Central Intelligence Agency, and that information would be exchanged about the armaments and social and political structures of Iran and Iraq.

3. We sought assistance from Agency experts in reviewing the structure of the State Security Department, which, according to the instructions given by His Highness the Emir, was to be accorded major priority at our meeting with the United States side. This would involve use of their expertise in drawing up a new strategy for action commensurate with the changes in the Gulf region and the country’s internal situation, by developing a computer system and automating functions in the State Security Department.

4. The United States side said it was entirely willing to meet our request for an exchange of information concerning the activities of Shia groups in the country and certain States of the Gulf Cooperation Council. Mr. Webster applauded our measures to combat movements in Iran and said that the Agency was willing to take joint steps to eliminate points of tension in the Gulf region.

5. We agreed with the American side that it was important to take advantage of the deteriorating economic situation in Iraq in order to put pressure on that country’s government to delineate our common border. The Central Intelligence Agency gave us its view of appropriate means of pressure, saying that broad cooperation should be initiated between us, on condition that such activities are coordinated at a high level.

6. The United States side is of the opinion that our relations with Iran should be conducted in such a way as, on the one hand, to avoid contact with that country, and on the other, to exert all possible economic pressure on it and to concentrate on effectively bolstering its alliance with Syria. The agreement with the United States side provides that Kuwait will avoid negative statements about Iran and restrict its efforts to influencing that country at Arab meetings.

7. We agreed with the United States side that it was important to combat drugs in the country, after Central Intelligence Agency narcotics experts informed us that much Kuwaiti capital is being used to promote drug trafficking in Pakistan and Iran, and that the spread of such trafficking will have negative consequences for the future of Kuwait.

8. The United States side placed a special telephone at our disposal to promote the rapid exchange of views and information that do not require written communications. The number of the telephone, which is Mr. Webster’s private line is, _________ .

source:
http://www.albasrah.net/pages/mod.php?mod=art&lapage=../en_articles_2007/1007/lagauche_291007.htm

===

-muslim voice-
______________________________________
BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Students Protest Islamo-Fascist Week on Campus

Posted by musliminsuffer on October 30, 2007

bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem
In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful

=== News Update ===

Students Protest Islamo-Fascist Week on Campus

By Riya Bhattacharjee (10-26-07)

The UC Berkeley Muslim Students Association (MSA) responded to Islamo-Fascist Week on campus with Peace Not Prejudice Week, ending today.

Funded by UC Berkeley alumnus and Republican activist David Horowitz and hosted by Berkeley College Republicans (BCR), Islamo-Fascist Week met with protests from more than 30 student groups on campus who joined together to form The Coalition for Peace Not Prejudice.

“Islamo-Fascist Week represents ignorance and indirect oppression of American Muslims,” said sophomore Saman Khalid, a member of MSA, which was also part of the coalition. “It’s against Islam … It’s offensive not just to Muslim students but to everybody. They are trying to inform moderate Muslims about radical Muslims. It’s ludicrous. I don’t think you need to inform Jews about Nazis or Blacks about Jim Crow.”

Berkeley College Republicans, who had set up a table across from the group Peace Not Prejudice at Sproul Plaza this week, said their events were in defense of moderate Muslims against radicals.

“It’s about making people aware of Islamic terrorism,” said Ross Lingenfelder, BCR president. “We are not talking about Catholic terrorism in Ireland or Hindu terrorism in Sri Lanka … It’s awareness about a really dangerous form of Islam that’s out to destroy the United States.”

Khalid told the Planet that BCR’s actions were threatening the safety of women wearing a hijab on campus.

“There was a man here on campus not affiliated with BCR who was carrying a huge sign that said ‘Islam Abuses Women’ and that it ‘promoted polygamy and wifebeating’ … If you are someone who has no idea about what Islam is then that message could give the wrong impression.”

BCR brought in Nonie Darwish, founder of Arabs for Israel, for a talk which was covered by television crews from the Washington D.C. bureau of Al Jazeera Monday.

“We are not talking about the average Muslim but about a radical strain,” said Lingenfelder, a UC Berkeley math major.

“The only complaint we are getting is that others might try to interpret our message in a wrong way. My goal is to polarize the radical in Islam and the peace-loving American Islam … [and] to expose how radical Muslims treat their women.”

“They are saying support moderate Muslims and not radical Muslims but are not providing a definition for either,” said senior and MSA political action committee co-chair Hamzah Hararah.

“For them Salman Rushdie might be a moderate, but for others he might not.”

UC Berkeley Chancellor Robert Birgeneau stopped by the Pride Not Prejudice table Wednesday.

“You are doing the right thing,” he told the students smiling.

He later told the Planet that the university was obligated to let students express their views since Berkeley was the birthplace of free speech.

“My pride lies with Peace Not Prejudice because they are conducting themselves in a dignified manner when they are being subjected to insult.”

source:
http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/article.cfm?issue=10-26-07&storyID=28303

===

-muslim voice-
______________________________________
BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »

Italy: Koran toilet seat cover angers cleric

Posted by musliminsuffer on October 30, 2007

bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem
In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful

=== News Update ===

Italy: Koran toilet seat cover angers cleric

Rome, 26 Oct. (AKI) – The imam of the Lazio town of Latina’s mosque, Sheikh Yusuf on Friday heckled interior minister Giuliano Amato as he visited Rome’s mosque to present the new ‘charter of values ‘ for immigrants.

“There is a toilet seat cover on sale in local stores that features verses of the Koran. This is an insult to the Muslim faith that we must react to,” he called out.

Amato however reassured Yusuf, saying: “I would like to tell our friends from Latina that we have been informed of this matter and are taking action because it is offensive.”

“Developed in consultation with various religious and civil society representatives, it establishes the principles for the harmonious integration in Italian society of non-Catholic communities.”

The charter, which has symbolic rather than legal value, is aimed at immigrants belonging to Muslim and other faiths and highlights the “values and principles that make up Italian identity and which are rooted in the Italian Constitution.”

source:
http://www.adnkronos.com/AKI/English/Religion/?id=1.0.1478998507

===

-muslim voice-
______________________________________
BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Vatican rebuffs Muslim outreach:Quran cited as the main obstacle

Posted by musliminsuffer on October 30, 2007

bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem
In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful

=== News Update ===

Vatican rebuffs Muslim outreach:Quran cited as the main obstacle

By Abdus Sattar Ghazali

AMP Report – October 29, 2007

Vatican has rebuffed a massive outreach effort by 138 Muslim religious leaders and scholars who sent a letter to Pope Benedict XVI in an attempt to improve Christian-Muslim relations.

The letter, titled “A Common Word Between Us and You,” which is also addressed to Christianity’s other most powerful leaders, including the Archbishop of Canterbury and the heads of the Lutheran, Methodist and Baptist churches, seeks to recognize similarities between Islam and Christianity as a way of fostering mutual understanding and respect between the two religions.

It compares texts from the Bible and the Koran to argue that Christians and Muslims worship the same God. Both believe in “the primacy of total love and devotion to God,” and both value love of neighbor and a peaceful world.

In a belated response to the Oct. 13 letter, Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran, President of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue in the Roman Curia, told the French Catholic daily La Croix, on Friday (Oct. 26) that a real theological debate with Muslims was difficult as they saw the Quran as the literal word of God. “Muslims do not accept that one can discuss the Quran in depth, because they say it was written by dictation from God. With such an absolute interpretation, it is difficult to discuss the contents of faith.”

Another reading of his comments suggests that the Vatican does not want a dialogue with Muslims unless they change their belief in Quran as a revealed book. Like most Christian theologians, the Muslims have to believe that sacred scriptures are the work of divinely inspired humans.

Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran’s comments echo Pope Benedict’s statement. In the summer of 2005, Pope Benedict devoted an annual weekend of study with former graduate students to Islam. During the meeting he reportedly expressed skepticism about Islam’s openness to change given the conviction that the Quran is the unchangeable word of God.

Vatican response to the Muslim outreach is significant because in his Regensburg, Germany, speech last year Pope Benedict implied that Islam was violent and irrational religion. His remarks sparked bloody protests in the Muslim world and prompted the Muslim scholars to unite to seek better inter-faith understanding.

Pope Benedict recently re-established an office for interfaith dialogue that he had shuttered, but the Roman Catholic Church has taken hard line stance towards Islam since the death of John Paul II in 2005, supporting diplomacy but not theological discussion. Pope John Paul met with Muslims more than 60 times over the course of his pontificate to build bridges. In May 1999, Pope John Paul II received a delegation of Iraqi Muslims who presented him Islam’s holy book, the Quran. The Pope bowed to the Quran and he kissed it as a sign of respect.

However, as a cardinal in the Holy See, the Pope Benedict was known to be skeptical of his predecessor John Paul II’s pursuit of conversation. One of his earliest decisions as pope was to move Archbishop Michael Fitzgerald, one of the Catholic Church’s leading experts on Islam, and head of its council on inter-religious dialogue, away from the centre of influence in Rome, and send him to Egypt as papal nuncio.

Benedict has spoken publicly of Christianity as the cornerstone of Europe and against the admission of Turkey into the European Council. He had said Turkey should seek its future in an association of Islamic nations, not with the EU, which has Christian roots. However, during his visit to Turkey in November 2006, Benedict softened of his opposition to Turkey’s long-sought membership in the European Union.

According to Marco Politi, the Vatican expert for the Italian daily La Repubblica: “Certainly he closes the door to an idea which was very dear to John Paul II – the idea that Christians, Jews and Muslims have the same God and have to pray together to the same God.” Recently Pope Benedict promoted the old Latin Mass, which contains references to the conversion of the Jews. The Latin mass, largely abandoned after Vatican II, has long been hated by Jews for its emphasis on the Jewish role in turning Jesus over to the Romans for crucifixion and for its call for Jews to come into the church.

Reverting to the 29-page letter that was welcomed by various leaders and institutions, including the Baptist World Alliance and the Most Rev. Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury and spiritual leader to the world’s 17 million Anglicans. Rev. Williams said: ‘The letter’s understanding of the unity of God provides an opportunity for Christians and Muslims to explore together their distinctive understandings and the ways in which these mould and shape our lives.’

The Evangelical Alliance in Britain welcomed the letter’s call for peace and understanding, but also pointed to differences between the two faiths. Anglican bishop Michael Nazir-Ali said that the letter seems to undercut the role of Jesus by emphasizing a part of the Quran that urges non-Muslims not to “ascribe any partners unto” God. The two faiths’ understanding of the oneness of God is not the same, he told the Times of London. “One partner cannot dictate the terms on which dialogue must be conducted,” he said. “This document seems to be on the verge of doing that.”

The letter offers interpretations of both the Quran and the Bible on the love of God, love of neighbor and other spiritual concepts that are similar in Christianity and Islam. It pointed out that finding common ground between Muslims and Christians is not simply a matter for polite ecumenical dialogue between selected religious leaders and added that: Christianity and Islam are the largest and second largest religions in the world and in history.

The two faiths account for more than half the world’s population, the letter notes. “Christians and Muslims reportedly make up over a third and over a fifth of humanity respectively. Together they make up more than 55% of the world’s population, making the relationship between these two religious communities the most important factor in contributing to meaningful peace around the world.”

“If Muslims and Christians are not at peace, the world cannot be at peace.”

The letter is signed by no fewer than 19 current and former grand ayatollahs and grand muftis from countries as diverse as Egypt, Turkey, Russia, Syria, Jordan, Palestine and Iraq. Signatories include Shaykh Sevki Omarbasic, Grand Mufti of Croatia; Dr Abdul Hamid Othman, adviser to the Prime Minister of Malaysia and Dr Ali Ozak, head of the endowment for Islamic scientific studies in Istanbul, Turkey. They also include Shaykh Dr Nuh Ali Salman Al-Qudah, Grand Mufti of Jordan and Shaykh Dr Ikrima Said Sabri, former Grand Mufti of Jerusalem and Imam of the Al-Aqsa Mosque.

Jordan’s Royal Aal al-Bayt Institute for Islamic Thought in Amman has been working for more than three years to prepare this letter. The Royal Institute was also responsible for the widely read Open Letter to the Pope following his controversial speech last year, which was signed by 38 high-level Muslim leaders.

The Jordanian Institute is hopeful that this historic letter would provide a common ground for the many organizations and individuals who are currently busy in interfaith dialogue all over the world.

source:
http://www.amperspective.com/html/vatican_rebuffs_outreach.html

Read also:
Pope’s attack on Islam was no casual slip

A common word between Muslims & Christians

===

-muslim voice-
______________________________________
BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

US Fascist and Racist : Minister ‘deeply disappointed’ by US airport detention

Posted by musliminsuffer on October 30, 2007

bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem
In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful

=== News Update ===

US Fascist and Racist : Minister ‘deeply disappointed’ by US airport detention

Elizabeth Stewart and agencies

Monday October 29, 2007

Guardian Unlimited

Britain’s first Muslim minister has described his disappointment at being detained – for a second time – at a US airport, where his hand luggage was analysed for traces of explosive materials.

International development minister Shahid Malik was returning to the UK yesterday morning after attending a series of meetings on tackling terrorism when was stopped and searched at Dulles Airport in Washington DC.

The MP for Dewsbury was detained by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – the same department whose representatives he had been meeting on his visit to the country.
Mr Malik said yesterday: “After a few minutes a couple of other people were also taken to one side. We were all Muslims – the other two were black Muslims, both with Muslim names.”

Mr Malik said he was particularly annoyed, as a similar incident happened to him last year, when he was detained for an hour at JFK airport in New York by the DHS.

This was despite the fact he had been a keynote speaker at an event organised by the department, alongside the FBI and Muslim organisations in New York.

Following the episode last year, Mr Malik received numerous apologies and assurances from the US authorities.

But after his detention yesterday, which lasted about 40 minutes, he said: “I am deeply disappointed.

“The abusive attitude I endured last November I forgot about and I forgave but I really do believe that British ministers and parliamentarians should be afforded the same respect and dignity at USA airports that we would bestow upon our colleagues in the Senate and Congress.

“Obviously, there was no malice involved but it has to be said that the US system does not inspire confidence.”

source:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,2201202,00.html

===

-muslim voice-
______________________________________
BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

How Islamic inventors changed the world

Posted by musliminsuffer on October 29, 2007

bismi-lLahi-rRahmani-rRahiem
In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful

=== News Update ===

How Islamic inventors changed the world

By Paul Vallely

From coffee to cheques and the three-course meal, the Muslim world has given us many innovations that we in the West take for granted. Here are 20 of their most influential innovations:

(1) The story goes that an Arab named Khalid was tending his goats in the Kaffa region of southern Ethiopia, when he noticed his animals became livelier after eating a certain berry.

He boiled the berries to make the first coffee. Certainly the first record of the drink is of beans exported from Ethiopia to Yemen where Sufis drank it to stay awake all night to pray on special occasions. By the late 15th century it had arrived in Makkah and Turkey from where it made its way to Venice in 1645.

It was brought to England in 1650 by a Turk named Pasqua Rosee who opened the first coffee house in Lombard Street in the City of London. The Arabic “qahwa” became the Turkish “kahve” then the Italian “caffé” and then English “coffee”.

(2) The ancient Greeks thought our eyes emitted rays, like a laser, which enabled us to see. The first person to realise that light enters the eye, rather than leaving it, was the 10th-century Muslim mathematician, astronomer and physicist Ibn al-Haitham.

He invented the first pin-hole camera after noticing the way light came through a hole in window shutters. The smaller the hole, the better the picture, he worked out, and set up the first Camera Obscura (from the Arab word “qamara” for a dark or private room).

He is also credited with being the first man to shift physics from a philosophical activity to an experimental one.

(3) A form of chess was played in ancient India but the game was developed into the form we know it today in Persia. From there it spread westward to Europe ­ where it was introduced by the Moors in Spain in the 10th century ­ and eastward as far as Japan. The word “rook” comes from the Persian “rukh”, which means chariot.

(4) A thousand years before the Wright brothers, a Muslim poet, astronomer, musician and engineer named Abbas ibn Firnas made several attempts to construct a flying machine. In 852 he jumped from the minaret of the Grand Mosque in Cordoba using a loose cloak stiffened with wooden struts.

He hoped to glide like a bird. He didn’t. But the cloak slowed his fall, creating what is thought to be the first parachute, and leaving him with only minor injuries.

In 875, aged 70, having perfected a machine of silk and eagles’ feathers he tried again, jumping from a mountain. He flew to a significant height and stayed aloft for ten minutes but crashed on landing ­ concluding, correctly, that it was because he had not given his device a tail so it would stall on landing. Baghdad international airport and a crater on the Moon are named after him.

(5) Washing and bathing are religious requirements for Muslims, which is perhaps why they perfected the recipe for soap which we still use today. The ancient Egyptians had soap of a kind, as did the Romans who used it more as a pomade.

But it was the Arabs who combined vegetable oils with sodium hydroxide and aromatics such as thyme oil. One of the Crusaders’ most striking characteristics, to Arab nostrils, was that they did not wash.

Shampoo was introduced to England by a Muslim who opened Mahomed’s Indian Vapour Baths on Brighton seafront in 1759 and was appointed Shampooing Surgeon to Kings George IV and William IV.

(6) Distillation, the means of separating liquids through differences in their boiling points, was invented around the year 800 by Islam’s foremost scientist, Jabir ibn Hayyan, who transformed alchemy into chemistry, inventing many of the basic processes and apparatus still in use today ­ liquefaction, crystallisation, distillation, purification, oxidisation, evaporation and filtration.

As well as discovering sulphuric and nitric acid, he invented the alembic still, giving the world intense rosewater and other perfumes and alcoholic spirits (although drinking them forbidden, in Islam). Ibn Hayyan emphasised systematic experimentation and was the founder of modern chemistry.

(7) The crank-shaft is a device which translates rotary into linear motion and is central to much of the machinery in the modern world, not least the internal combustion engine. One of the most important mechanical inventions in the history of humankind, it was created by an ingenious Muslim engineer called al-Jazari to raise water for irrigation.

His Book of Knowledge of Ingenious Mechanical Devices (1206) shows he also invented or refined the use of valves and pistons, devised some of the first mechanical clocks driven by water and weights, and was the father of robotics. Among his 50 other inventions was the combination lock.

(8) Quilting is a method of sewing or tying two layers of cloth with a layer of insulating material in between. It is not clear whether it was invented in the Muslim world or whether it was imported there from India or China.

However, it certainly came to the West via the Crusaders. They saw it used by Saracen warriors, who wore straw-filled quilted canvas shirts instead of armour. As well as a form of protection, it proved an effective guard against the chafing of the Crusaders’ metal armour and was an effective form of insulation ­ so much so that it became a cottage industry back home in colder climates such as Britain and Holland.

(9) The pointed arch so characteristic of Europe’s Gothic cathedrals was an invention borrowed from Islamic architecture. It was much stronger than the rounded arch used by the Romans and Normans, thus allowing the building of bigger, higher, more complex and grander buildings.

Other borrowings from Muslim genius included ribbed vaulting, rose windows and dome-building techniques. Europe’s castles were also adapted to copy the Islamic world’s ­ with arrow slits, battlements, a barbican and parapets. Square towers and keeps gave way to more easily defended round ones. The architect of Henry V’s castle was a Muslim.

(10) Many modern surgical instruments are of exactly the same design as those devised in the 10th century by a Muslim surgeon called al-Zahrawi. His scalpels, bone saws, forceps, fine scissors for eye surgery and many of the 200 instruments he devised are recognisable to a modern surgeon.

It was he who discovered that catgut used for internal stitches dissolves away naturally (a discovery he made when his monkey ate his lute strings) and that it can be also used to make medicine capsules.

In the 13th century, another Muslim medic named Ibn Nafis described the circulation of the blood, 300 years before William Harvey discovered it. Muslim doctors also invented anaesthetics of opium and alcohol mixes and developed hollow needles to suck cataracts from eyes in a technique still used today.

(11) The windmill was invented in 634 for a Persian caliph and was used to grind corn and draw up water for irrigation. In the vast deserts of Arabia, when the seasonal streams ran dry, the only source of power was the wind which blew steadily from one direction for months. Mills had six or 12 sails covered in fabric or palm leaves. It was 500 years before the first windmill was seen in Europe.

(12) The technique of inoculation was not invented by Jenner and Pasteur but was devised in the Muslim world and brought to Europe from Turkey by the wife of the English ambassador to Istanbul in 1724. Children in Turkey were vaccinated with cowpox to fight the deadly smallpox at least 50 years before the West discovered it.

(13) The fountain pen was invented for the Sultan of Egypt in 953 after he demanded a pen which would not stain his hands or clothes. It held ink in a reservoir and, as with modern pens, fed ink to the nib by a combination of gravity and capillary action.

(14) The system of numbering in use all round the world is probably Indian in origin but the style of the numerals is Arabic and first appears in print in the work of the Muslim mathematicians al-Khwarizmi and al-Kindi around 825.

Algebra was named after al-Khwarizmi’s book, Al-Jabr wa-al-Muqabilah, much of whose contents are still in use. The work of Muslim maths scholars was imported into Europe 300 years later by the Italian mathematician Fibonacci.

Algorithms and much of the theory of trigonometry came from the Muslim world. And Al-Kindi’s discovery of frequency analysis rendered all the codes of the ancient world soluble and created the basis of modern cryptology.

(15) Ali ibn Nafi, known by his nickname of Ziryab (Blackbird) came from Iraq to Cordoba in the 9th century and brought with him the concept of the three-course meal ­ soup, followed by fish or meat, then fruit and nuts. He also introduced crystal glasses (which had been invented after experiments with rock crystal by Abbas ibn Firnas).

(16) Carpets were regarded as part of paradise by mediaeval Muslims, thanks to their advanced weaving techniques, new tinctures from Islamic chemistry and highly developed sense of pattern and arabesque which were the basis of Islam’s non-representational art.

In contrast, Europe’s floors were distinctly earthly, not to say earthy, until Arabian and Persian carpets were introduced. In England, as Erasmus recorded, floors were “covered in rushes, occasionally renewed, but so imperfectly that the bottom layer is left undisturbed, sometimes for 20 years, harbouring expectoration, vomiting, the leakage of dogs and men, ale droppings, scraps of fish, and other abominations not fit to be mentioned”. Carpets, unsurprisingly, caught on quickly.

(17) The modern cheque comes from the Arabic “saqq”, a written vow to pay for goods when they were delivered, to avoid money having to be transported across dangerous terrain. In the 9th century, a Muslim businessman could cash a cheque in China drawn on his bank in Baghdad.

(18) By the 9th century, many Muslim scholars took it for granted that the Earth was a sphere. The proof, said astronomer Ibn Hazm, “is that the Sun is always vertical to a particular spot on Earth”. It was 500 years before that realisation dawned on Galileo.

The calculations of Muslim astronomers were so accurate that in the 9th century they reckoned the Earth’s circumference to be 40, 253.4km ­ less than 200km out. Al-Idrisi took a globe depicting the world to the court of King Roger of Sicily in 1139.

(19) Though the Chinese invented saltpetre gunpowder, and used it in their fireworks, it was the Arabs who worked out that it could be purified using potassium nitrate for military use. Muslim incendiary devices terrified the Crusaders.

By the 15th century they had invented both a rocket, which they called a “self-moving and combusting egg”, and a torpedo ­ a self-propelled pear-shaped bomb with a spear at the front which impaled itself in enemy ships and then blew up.

(20) Mediaeval Europe had kitchen and herb gardens, but it was the Arabs who developed the idea of the garden as a place of beauty and meditation. The first royal pleasure gardens in Europe were opened in 11th-century Muslim Spain. Flowers which originated in Muslim gardens include the carnation and the tulip. (Courtesy: The Independent)

source:
http://www.dawn.com/weekly/science/archive/060325/science3.htm

===

-muslim voice-
______________________________________
BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »